No Pain Act


If you are a person living with high impact or intractable pain, this is going to affect you greatly.

Please read the article below and see what our government wants to do with persons after surgery. Also how they want to treat the chronic pain population! This is ludicrous and it’s full of horrible lies! What needs to happen before someone in power, with an intelligent mind, helps us?

This is terrible!!! Bad for all CPP’s https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5172/text?r=1&s=1&fbclid=IwAR3w6u9IAsALdca5cBvWJRXrzucDwbYi4vmhWdYv-Gexyj5R2HRWjk0mNMs

Regarding Buprenorphrine-Suboxone


Hello my friends! For this blog post you should probably grab yourself a cup of coffee and sit down to read this short story! I’m sorry that this article is more like a “short story” than a blog post! It’s twice as long as any of my normal posts would be. But this just meshed and I wanted this information available to you.

In my opinion, I would prefer no treatment than be forced to take some of these harmful/ horrific medications. By the way, I researched them and they are still not FDA approved for chronic pain patients.  In September 2018, a form of Bupenorphrine, a sublingual film, was FDA approved “for opioid use disorder. ” It was also approved for the maintenance of “opioid dependence”. But if your physician prescribes it for your chronic pain, “off label”; and you are not a patient with “Opioid use disorder” or an “Opioid abuser” then  you may possibly get a very low analgesic effect. Might as well take that Tylenol they’ve been pushing at us? It will help just about as much.  Well, you all know what I mean, right?

Here’s another thought:  Opioids, (*which are being demonized by our government now) can have a few side effects but normally they go away within a week or so after taking them. The side effects can be:

  1. Constipation
  2. Shallow breathing (but that is only if you take more than what is needed for your height/weight and medical conditions)
  3. Once in awhile you can get nausea and/or vomiting (but the nausea lasts a couple of days at the most.  I’ve not experienced vomiting from Opioids.

Here are the list of side effects for the FDA approved Bupenorphrine and Naloxone sublingual film (called Cassipa): Proof of these Side effects of this medication online

  1. oral hypoeshesia (numbness),
  2. glossodynia (burning mouth)
  3. oral mucosal erythema (inflammation of the oral mucous membrane *sores in your mouth*
  4. headache,
  5. nausea
  6. vomiting,
  7. hyperhidrosis (excessisve sweating)
  8. constipation,
  9. **SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF WITHDRAWAL**
  10. Insomnia
  11. **PAIN**
  12. Peripheral edema (accumualtion of fluid causing swelling in the lower limbs

**THESE PRODUCTS MAY ONLY BE PRESCRIBED BY DRUG ADDICION TREATMENT ACT (DATA)-CERTIFIED PRESCRIBERS. With this list of side effects and all of the warnings, how or why is is supposed to be OK to use, but other

***BELBUCA:  is another type of “opioid”, similar to the above, but without the Naloxone. It is also a partial antagonist. (**It is very different from the kind Opioids that most pain patients are familiar with. The opioids that we know are able to help alleviate high amounts of daily, round the clock, high impact chronic pain).

I visited the Belbuca online and their website has a bunch of videos showing people with chronic pain and how this medcation has supposedly helped them (they are paid actors most likely).  The list of effects appear to be much longer and worse, in my opinion. The list of bad effects on the majority of opioids that many chronic pain patients have safely taken for years; or even decades, appears to be much less toxic and life altering or even, threatening.  On that same page, they say that “Methadone maintenance is  helpful for people who don’t do well with buprenorphrine. But people (mainly addicts) have to visit a clinic daily to recive that treatment.”  Our favorite guy (*cough cough), Kolodny, says now that “Suboxone is a viable treatment akin to buprenorphrine.” *Also, did you know that once you take Bupenorphrine or Suboxone, you will be labeled an “addict” & no longer a chronic pain patient/warrior! See: Opioid Addiction Treatments). Kolodny ‘s trying to not only rid the USA, but the world possibly, of opioids and replace them with much more harsh opioids! Suboxone which he calls “akin to buprenophrine” has been proven to have none or a very low analgesic effect. If taken, this so called medicine, LABELS you for life as an “ADDICT”. Yes, you are labeled for life as an addict if you accept Kolodny’s “get rich scheme” & take these harsh addiction medications! They are very different from normal pain medications that most people with long term chronic pain illnesses have been doing well on, for decades! Suboxone & Bupenorphrine also have a long list of worse than horrible side effects. Why & how are these OK to give to sick people living with horrific amounts of daily pain? People who are seeking any kind of reprieve, relief from their painful existence in hell.

Please be aware of this crooked switch to these harsh addiction medications. Please understand that the cowardly physicians, who prescribe these meds, do not have the patients best interest at heart. Instead they’re lining Kolodny’s and others wallets and bank accounts.

All the while we are suffering and being lumped together with addicts (yes, they need help too. But that is their story to tell). I have testimonials a mile long from several persons who had been prescribed these harsh addiction medications & who’ve taken one form or another of Bupenorphrine or Suboxone. They said “it was the worst medication they’d ever taken and it has horrific side effects that are unrelenting & never ending. IF you dare try to go off of it, or taper down (*as you can do with the regular kinds of opioids that most patients are familiar with), those medications tend to pull you in even deeper. They’re designed to keep you addicted . They work against your body and majorly increases your pain so that you won’t stop taking it. You cannot ever go off of it “cold turkey”. If you try, then you may experience withdrawals that I’ve been told are hellish. Worse than anything I’ve ever heard about regarding opioid withdrawals.

In a future blog post, I will try to add more & organize them. I’ll let you read what others have sent to me. I have permission from several persons because they want you to know what they have had to endure; in order to save you from going through the same hellish experiences.

DISCLAIMER: *I AM STATING THAT THIS MEDICATION IS NOT GOOD FOR HELPING THE CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS! BUT IT MAY BE A “WEAK ANALGESIC” THAT COULD HELP AN ADDICT, A DRUG ADDICT, WHO LIVES ALSO WITH CHRONIC PAIN! That’s what it’s good for!!

Update On Upcoming Skull-Neuro-Ear Surgery


Hello Everyone !

Above is a 37 second update from my appointment today 6-10-19. Thank you for the outpouring of love ❤️ and support! You’re the Best followers/fans/friends ever!!

**ADDENDUM: SURGERY WILL BE JULY 26, 2019** they scheduled it today…. JUST WANTED TO UPDATE YOU ALL… sending peace, hope, love & Light…

Feel free to email me: tearsoftruth@yahoo.com

Love ❤️

Suzy

Heres my Instagram post today too:
So I saw the Skull base/neuro/Ear surgeon today. I will be having the tumor removed soon. I will have a Tympanoplasty(they’ll reconstruct my eardrum using a “disc” made from cartledge & Skull fascia. This is to prevent this from returning. The 3 little bones needed for hearing are diseased. I’ll be getting possibly prosthetic bones? Also I’ll be having a “Mastoidectomy”! Removal of the diseased part of the mastoid bone. It may make my HOH/ “hearing”worse or same but must do this because if it gets into the brain it can kill me! It’s really scary! Many times people hear nothing afterwards, many times people get extreme dry mouth from damage to salivary glands during surgery. Many people get worse “white noise” or pulsating in ear after surgery. Many people get a strange taste for months or forever. They try to not injure the facial nerves by doing EMG during entire surgery, but it can happen… I’m honestly not scared of the white noise or pulsating or worse/same HoH —but I’m frightened of the brain surgery part. They say they’ll be conservative with my hair being cut but still a 2 finger radius around my ear will be cut… just wanted to update everyone. It will be in 2 months because it’s very slow growing tumor and may have been there my whole life?? But it takes time to get the 4 Drs clearances that I need and also his schedule is booked until then. Now I’m happy to have my Summer but still scared because I now have too much time to be thinking about it all!

A Letter To Our Leaders, Regarding The Pain Crisis


I have copied and posted below, this 2nd & 3rd letters that I’ve now sent to our President and several other politicians/legislators. If you have someone else that you’d like to send this to, please feel free to copy & paste my letter and send it to any legislators.

Here’s a list of recipients so far:

  • President Donald J. Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania NW, Washington DC 20500
  • Michigan Senators Debbie Stabinaw & Gary Peters:
  • 1: senator@stabinaw.senate.gov
  •  Senator Gary Peters  C/O Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building, 477 Michigan Avenue, Suite #1837, Detroit, MI 48226

**my US state of Michigan representative Hailey Stephens: Washington, DC Office   

**my US State of Michigan representative District #20:

***mailto:MattKoleszar@house.mi.gov

Dear Mr. President,

I represent only one out of 100 million people in the chronic pain community. Out of that number, there are an estimated 26 million of us who urgently need your help.  Many people in the United States of America are  dealing with horrific pain on a daily basis.  I stand along with them  & implore you to help put an end to the violation of human rights that is taking place. 

The CDC, DEA and “Big Brother” Pharma companies are “hurting” the American chronic pain Community. We are losing access to medically necessary medications that enable us to live some semblance of a life. 

We are and have been losing access to our pain relieving medications since the implementation of 2016 CDC Guidelines.  Those guidelines were written by addiction experts and there was not one Pain management Dr. present. They were also written in secret, behind closed doors by a group of people who know nothing about high impact, ongoing, chronic, painful illnesses.

A Dr. should not be afraid to prescribe Opioid pain medications to their patients because of repercussions from the CDC or DEA. But our pain Physicians are leaving in droves because of them & the 2016 CDC Guidelines. 

The  “Opioid epidemic” is about illegal/illicit fentanyl brought here from Mexico & China. It’s not about us, the 100 million chronic pain patients in the USA. Only 1% of legitimate chronic pain patients who are legitimately prescribed opioids, for high amounts of pain, ever become addicted. It’s as though our country is now torturing and punishing people for being ill.

Mr. President, we are not addicts and we are not “addicted”.  A person can be “dependent” on a medication and not be addicted! They are two very different situations. We are not addicted to our medications and we do not get cravings nor do we get “high” from them. An addict seeks out their “drug of choice” at any cost.  They look forward to taking them because of the “high” they get. A legitimate chronic pain patient who’s done well for years on a stable dose of opioid pain medication, doesn’t get any sort of “high”.  We also take our medications responsibly.  We get some relief and reprieve from the daily chronic pain that we live with. 

Please help us get back the physician / patient relationship, without interference from Pharmacy’s, insurers, the government and politics.  Please help us to keep our Drs in charge. It should be the decision between patient/physician to choose what is necessary and best for our pain control. They went to medical school and the government did not.

Many pain management Dr’s are leaving the practices they’ve built and the profession they’ve worked hard at, to achieve. They’re  afraid because they are being wrongly targeted by the DEA . They aren’t free to prescribe medications that help to relieve pain anymore. 

People in the USA in 2019 are being tortured and hurt by this on a daily basis. Just yesterday, I read the story of a 94-year-old woman who shattered her kneecap and was taken to the hospital emergency room. They immobilized her knee and sent her home without any pain control at all. Can you even imagine shattering your kneecap and not getting any thing to help with a torturous pain like that?
Mr. President, please help us? I understand there are people who die from overdoses. But they are a totally separate group of people who need a different kind of help. It shouldn’t be at the expense of an entire separate community of citizens. People In pain are being taken off of their Opioid pain medication during one visit to the Dr’s office. Often it’s a Dr. that they’ve gone to for years and they’d been living some semblance of a life while on a regimen of medication for pain control. But because of “fear”, Dr’s are taking away the little bit of life that some of us have left. 

I also don’t believe that anyone should be FORCED to have an invasive surgery in their spine or anywhere for that matter; when an inexpensive & safe pill, with little side effects can help so much. 

I implore you to help the estimated 26 million chronic pain patients in the USA, who are “dependent” on opioids for pain control & who are diligent and take these medications responsibly. Help us to get back the freedom of choice. Get us back to the pain management medication regimens that are life sustaining for us with more tolerable pain levels.

Please read my letter and talk to me if you’d like. We need you to understand that we are “chronic pain patients” and not “addicts”! We are just real people living with unfortunate circumstances & high pain illnesses. Please help us to receive the medications that give us some semblance of a life for ourselves & our families.

Sincerely,

Suzanne B. Stewart
Recipient of U.S. Pain Ambassador of the Year Award‘16, Mentor @RSDSA, freelance writer, Blogger/Blog “Tears Of Truth” @tearsoftruth.com, Patient leader WEGO Health, HoH/ASL, Director of communications for Deaf/HoH for CIAAG, patient advocate for Deaf/HoH

Frontal lobotomy for the relief of intractable pain • CERGM


Hello Luvs,

Ohh My Goodness!!! Has our society gone completely mad now? These “sickos” may be taking us back in time to a period when people were given a Frontal lobotomy for the relief of intractable pain!! This is absolutely crazy, when a safe pill, called an “opioid” can help our chronic intractable pain patients. Who in their right mind would choose a frontal lobotomy over a safe an effective pill? The opioids that are getting a bad rap from anti-opioid zealots (read more about them, here: Anti-Opioid Zealots ), are not hurting the legitimate chronic pain patients. People who’ve been prescribed opioids for years, (a decade or even more) & have done well; are NOT addicted! Only about 1% of true chronic pain patients actually ever become “addicted” (Writer Josh Bloom, gives you statistics here: The Opioid Epidemic in 6 Charts, Designed to Deceive You ). It’s not prescription opioids that are the problem! It’s the illegal fentanyl from China & Mexico that are hurting, addicting & killing people! Addiction and dependence are two very different situations. You can find out more information about that here: Addiction & Dependence Are Not The Same

Who are the bad actors? Government, Healthcare or Patients? • CERGM
— Read on cergm.carter-brothers.com/2019/03/28/frontal-lobotomy-for-the-relief-of-intractable-pain/

Pushing Pain Patients into Labels “Opioid Misuse”


Hello Luvs,
My fellow advocate and friend, Bob Schubring sent me this message via email. I wanted to share with his permission. It’s regarding a bit of a turn around regarding this under-treated & untreated pain crisis. So without further ado, here is the message sending love & light:
“I’ve taken the liberty of clipping and dropping the entire article below.  It is compelling and I believe highly representative of the experience of many chronic pain patients.  Please feel free to reference these published findings in your own editorial or advocacy work.  I also attempted to submit a comment,  but NEMJ isn’t accepting input from non-subscribers.  I’ll look for a comment gateway direct to the editors. 

Title:  Reported Outcomes for Mister O are Highly Representative

As a non-physician advocate for chronic pain patients with 22 years experience, I see the story of Mr O repeated widely and horrendously.  The current regulatory environment on opioid analgesic therapy is grossly distorted by mythologies about who becomes addicted and from what sources.  Public policy is actively denying treatment to hundreds of thousands of people in agony.  Doctors are fleeing practice, deserting their patients;  those who do not flee are refusing the therapies that are often the only effective measures.

The largest mythology is the least acknowledged:  physician over-prescribing did not cause and is not sustaining our public health crisis in addiction and mortality.  CDC statistics reveal no cause and effect relationship between State by State prescribing rates vs opioid-related mortality from all sources, legal, diverted, or illegal. Contribution of medically managed opioids is so small that it gets lost in the noise of street drugs.  Moreover, the demographics don’t work and never have.  Seniors have the highest prescription rates and the lowest mortality due to opioids. People under 30 are six times more likely than seniors to die of opioids. 
Regards, 
Richard A “Red” Lawhern PhD

Director of Research

Alliance for the Treatment of Intractable Pain  

on Twitter: @theatipusa
Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/ATIPUSA/
My Publications: http://www.face-facts.org/Lawhern
Personal Website:  http://www.lawhern.org

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1811473

Structural Iatrogenesis — A 43-Year-Old Man with “Opioid Misuse”

  • Scott Stonington, M.D., Ph.D., 
  • and Diana Coffa, M.D

Mr. O., a 43-year-old man with severe, destructive rheumatoid arthritis, had been receiving acetaminophen–hydrocodone at low doses from his primary care provider (PCP) for 15 years. He worked in an auto-parts factory in southeastern Michigan, and pain control was essential to maintaining his employment. His pain had been well managed on a stable regimen, and he had not shown evidence of opioid use disorder.
In 2011, his primary care clinic began requiring patient–provider agreements (“pain contracts”) and regular urine drug testing. Mr. O. participated willingly, and his tests were consistently negative for unprescribed substances. In 2014, his insurance company began to require annual prior authorization for all controlled-substance refills. Although there were small delays in receiving medication once a year when the authorization was due, the patient was able to keep his pain level stable on his usual regimen.
In 2016, Mr. O.’s PCP retired, and his care was transferred to another PCP in the same office, who followed the patient’s existing pain-management plan. The same year, the insurance company began requiring more frequent prior authorizations and then that prescriptions be sent to the pharmacy every 15 days. The new PCP was occasionally late providing these prescriptions and approving prior authorizations because of the required multistep interactions with the insurance company. Mr. O. did not own a car and had difficulty making frequent trips to the pharmacy. He began to have several-day gaps in medication. During these gaps, he experienced severe pain and mild withdrawal, as a result of which he performed poorly at work and received a citation. He became very concerned about losing his job.

Mr. O. made an appointment with his PCP and requested an increase in his number of pills, wanting to “stockpile pills so that I’ll never run out.” The PCP noted that Mr. O. seemed nervous during the conversation. She noted in the chart that the interaction “made her uncomfortable.” She knew that the previous PCP had reported that Mr. O. had shown no evidence of opioid misuse, but in the current environment of vigilance regarding the risks posed by opiates, she did not feel comfortable increasing the number of pills.

Three months later, the patient submitted a urine sample that tested positive for unprescribed oxycodone. When the PCP discussed the result with Mr. O., she learned that he had obtained oxycodone from a friend during one of his gaps in medication. 

The following month, oxycodone was once again found in his urine. Already overwhelmed by the frequent need for prior authorizations, and noting that Mr. O. had “violated his contract” by submitting two urine samples containing unprescribed opioids, the PCP referred him to a local pain clinic.

The wait time for an appointment at the clinic was 4 months. The PCP continued to provide prescriptions during that period, planning to stop prescribing as soon as Mr. O. had his first appointment. When he arrived at the pain clinic, Mr. O. learned that it had a policy of not prescribing opioids for the first two visits. Facing a prolonged period without his usual regimen, and having previously failed to obtain any “extra” acetaminophen–hydrocodone from his PCP, Mr. O. began purchasing his full narcotic regimen (in the form of oxycodone) from a friend.

Social Analysis Concept: Structural Iatrogenesis

Through a series of events, Mr. O.’s therapeutic relationship with his PCP deteriorated, and he became compelled to obtain medications outside the medical setting, which in turn increased his risk of overdose, as well as his risk of arrest for possession of unprescribed opioids. This shift was not precipitated by physiological changes in Mr. O.’s disease, need for medication, or personal attributes. Rather, it was caused by structural forces outside his control, ranging from clinic policies (pain agreements, a drug-testing initiative, a moratorium on prescribing) to corporate bureaucracies (insurance companies, factory management) to larger-scale social forces (poverty, lack of availability of transportation, lack of opportunities for work appropriate for someone with a painful condition).

We call this type of harm “structural iatrogenesis” (see box). Drawing on a long history of social science scholarship,1the use of the term “structure” emphasizes that Mr. O.’s poor outcome was determined by social forces and structures outside his control. The term “iatrogenesis” specifically focuses on the harmful role of bureaucratic structures within medicine itself. In Mr. O.’s case, many of these structures had been instituted to protect patients at risk for opioid use disorder: clinicians acted according to prevailing standards of care in chronic pain management; his prior clinic’s pain contract and urine drug screens were meant to prevent deviation from prescribed opioid use that might place him at risk for overdose or addiction; the pain clinic’s protocol of delayed prescribing was meant to prevent patients from “shopping” for opioid prescriptions; prior authorizations required by the insurance company were intended to reduce overprescription of potentially harmful (and costly) medications. But these systems were not beneficial to Mr. O. in the context of his economically and socially precarious life, which was shaped by a lack of transportation and a need to perform painful manual labor for economic survival.

Structural Iatrogenesis

Structural iatrogenesis is the causing of clinical harm to patients by bureaucratic systems within medicine, including those intended to benefit them.

Structural iatrogenesis is a type of “structural violence,” defined as the systematic infliction of disproportionate harm on certain people by large-scale social forces such as resource distribution and hierarchies of race, gender, or language.2,3 “Iatrogenesis” points to the causation of such harm by bureaucratic systems that are potentially under clinicians’ or health systems’ control.4

Clinical Implications: Stopping Structural Iatrogenesis

Clinicians who identify structural iatrogenesis may alter structures or create action plans to prevent them from causing harm. Generalizing from Mr. O.’s case, we would offer the following approach:


1. Recognize and alter structures that systematically harm patients.
 Clinicians may be the first to identify a structure that is systematically harming patients and can then advocate for or directly effect change. For example, in the 1980s, the Food and Drug Administration and physician organizations recommended that women undergo pelvic exams before receiving hormonal contraception. Some clinicians noted that these exams were a barrier to contraceptive access and stopped requiring them in their own clinics. By the 1990s, these local changes led to removal of the recommendation from national policy, which increased access to contraception and rates of effective use.5

Similarly, if Mr. O.’s PCP noticed that her clinic’s opioid-prescribing policy generated frequent gaps in medication coverage for patients in general, she could have advocated for a new approach. It’s important, however, to avoid the pitfall of thinking that structural harm emerges only from “broken” systems. All structures carry a risk of harm, even when they are functioning “properly.” 
The policy in Mr. O.’s PCP’s office might have been working well for most patients, but it turned out to be a poor fit for Mr. O.


2. Bend policies according to context.
 Attempts to standardize clinical care in order to ensure high quality often inadvertently lump complex phenomena into simplistic categories. Such oversimplification, in turn, can create structures within clinical care that harm patients more than help them. By questioning how such categories (such as “opioid misuse”) apply to particular patients and types of patients, clinicians can work to reduce the risk of structural iatrogenesis. The label of “opioid misuser,” for example, negatively affected Mr. O.’s care by failing to acknowledge reasons that he might be acquiring medications outside the clinic.
Similarly, clinic policies that penalize patients for arriving late to appointments disproportionately harm people who don’t own a car or control their work schedule. And policies of rewarding clinicians on the basis of quantitative measures of practice quality, such as reductions in glycated hemoglobin levels, may ignore complex disease interactions and the social factors contributing to diabetes and may create an incentive for clinicians to drop particularly sick patients. Instead, one might identify patients with particular vulnerabilities and adjust policies on the basis of their life context
3. Address implicit agendas head-on. Mr. O.’s care deteriorated when he was labeled an “opioid misuser.” This designation was putatively a clinical diagnosis, but it also marked a tacit category shift from “good patient” to “bad patient,” reflecting the mixing of clinical reasoning with moral judgment. Similarly, the insurance company’s rationale for requiring more frequent prescriptions mixed a harm-reduction agenda (reducing risk for addiction and death) with a profit motive (reducing payouts for medications). Mr. O’s poor clinical outcome was due in part to tensions between these implicit agendas. Clinicians often consider such agendas to be outside their purview, but given that they have such a significant impact on clinical outcomes, it may be more effective clinically to identify these agendas, assess their interactions, and decide which ones to prioritize. The staff of Mr. O.’s clinic, for example, could recognize the moral judgment involved in the diagnosis of “opioid misuse” and instead set an explicit goal of identifying behaviors that could increase a patient’s risk of addition, overdose, or dangerous side effects. They could then assess whether their established protocols were achieving that goal and how to balance it with other goals.

Case Follow-up

At Mr. O.’s next visit, his PCP expressed concern about risks of overdose and legal harm from use of unprescribed oxycodone. She persuaded him to return to the pain clinic, and in the meantime she agreed to continue prescribing his opioids. A medical assistant appealed for an exemption to the insurance company’s 15-day prescription rule, citing Mr. O.’s lack of transportation, fragile work circumstances, and long-standing treatment. At the time we wrote this article, it remained unclear whether these modifications would stabilize Mr. O.’s treatment and prevent his use of unprescribed opioids.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available at NEJM.org.

The editors of the Case Studies in Social Medicine are Scott D. Stonington, M.D., Ph.D., Seth M. Holmes, Ph.D., M.D., Helena Hansen, M.D., Ph.D., Jeremy A. Greene, M.D., Ph.D., Keith A. Wailoo, Ph.D., Debra Malina, Ph.D., Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., Paul E. Farmer, M.D., Ph.D., and Michael G. Marmot, M.B., B.S., Ph.D.

The patient’s initial and some identifying characteristics have been changed to protect his privacy.

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Anthropology and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor (S.S.); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (D.C.)

They Fell like Dominos: My License, My Certification, My Profession


Hello Luvs,This blog post is actually something that was written and sent to me by Dr Mark Ibsen, MD, a physician from Helena, MT. He wrote and says:

“I had similar experience. 
Guilty. 
Not even “guilty until proven innocent”
Just guilty. 
Once they set their sights on you,
You
Are
Fkkd. 

This system is feudal. 
Primitive. 
Insensitive. 
Ineffective. 
Unchecked, as in no checks or balances. 
Run by appointed people who are completely unaccountable. 
No recourse. 
In the name of “safety”, 
With no evidence of harm. 
Like a trip to the Gulag. 

The key is for patients to realize that doctors have become so vulnerable that we cannot risk ANY exposure to ANY accusations. 
A risk-averse environment due to the hostile regulatory environment we now have. 

So, as more and more patients despair over being abandoned by this system, the sacred physician patient relationship is further tarnished. 

I, for one, will continue to stand by the patients I can, and pray for those I cannot.” 

Here’s the article that accompanied the email from Dr Mark Ibsen, MD:

They Fell like Dominos: My License, My Certification, My Profession

Mark Ibsen MD
Helena MT